Archive for the Immigration Category

Patrick J. Buchanan: The NAFTA super highway

Posted in Immigration with tags on November 1, 2008 by zion2day

The NAFTA super highway

by Patrick J. Buchanan

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

 

This is a “mind-boggling concept,” exploded Lou Dobbs. It must cause Americans to think our political and academic elites have “gone utterly mad.” What had detonated the mild-mannered CNN anchor?

 

Dr. Robert Pastor, vice chair of the Council on Foreign Relations Task Force on North America, had just appeared before a panel of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations — to call for erasing all U.S. borders and a merger of the United States, Mexico and Canada in a North American union stretching from Prudhoe Bay to Guatemala.

 

Under the Pastor-CFR plan, the illegal alien invasion would be solved by eliminating America’s borders and legalizing the invasion. We would no longer defend the Rio Grande.

 

“What we need to do,” Pastor instructed, “is forge a new North American Community. … Instead of stopping North Americans on the borders, we ought to provide them with a secure, biometric Border Pass that would ease transit across the border like an E-Z pass permits our cars to speed through tolls.”

 

The Pastor-CFR project, for “economic integration” of Mexamerica, is on the drawing board. North-south highways and railways would be built to weld us together as the American Union was welded together by the Northern Pacific, Union Pacific and Southern Pacific, and Ike’s Interstate Highway System.

 

Speaking in Madrid in 2002, Mexican President Vicente Fox declared: “Our long-range objective is to establish with the United States … an ensemble of connections and institutions similar to those created by the European Union, with the goal of attending to future themes as important as … the freedom of movement of capital, goods, services and persons. The new framework we wish to construct is inspired in the example of the European Union.”

 

Critical element of the Fox post-NAFTA agenda: absolute freedom of movement for persons between Mexico and the United States — a merger of the nations. Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto Debrez put it succinctly in April 2005. What Mexico is about is “complete integration” of the two nations.

 

To appreciate what Fox, Debrez, Pastor and the CFR wish America to merge with, consider a few excerpts from the State Department information sheet on Mexico.

 

While hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens marched beneath Mexican flags in U.S. cities on May Day to demand amnesty, Mexico’s constitution “prohibits political activities by foreigners, and such actions may result in detentions and deportations.”

 

“Crime in Mexico continues at high levels, and it is often violent, especially in Mexico City, Tijuana, Ciudad Juarez, Nuevo Laredo (and) Acapulco,” State warns U.S. travelers. “Low apprehension rates and conviction rates of criminals contribute to the high crime rate.”

 

“Women traveling alone are especially vulnerable. … Victims … have been raped, robbed of personal property or abducted and then held while their credit cards are used at various businesses and automatic teller machines. … Kidnapping, including the kidnapping of non-Mexicans, continues at alarming rates.”

 

When Fox proposed his merger of America and Mexico in a North American Union, Robert Bartley, for 30 years editorial page editor of The Wall Street Journal, declared him a “visionary” and pledged solidarity: “He (Fox) can rest assured that there is one voice north of the Rio Grande that supports his vision … this newspaper.”

 

The American people never supported NAFTA, and they are angry over Bush’s failure to secure the border — but a shotgun marriage between our two nations appears prearranged. Central feature: a ten-lane, 400-yard-wide NAFTA Super Highway from the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas, up to and across the U.S. border, all the way to Canada. Within the median strip dividing the north and south car and truck lanes would be rail lines for both passengers and freight traffic, and oil and gas pipelines.

 

As author Jerome Corsi describes this Fox-Bush autobahn, container ships from China would unload at Lazaro Cardenas, a port named for the Mexican president who nationalized all U.S. oil companies in 1938. From there, trucks with Mexican drivers would run fast lines into the United States, hauling their cargo to a U.S. customs inspection terminal — in Kansas City, Mo. From there, the trucks would fan out across America or roll on into Canada. Similar super-highways from Mexico through the United States into Canada are planned.

 

According to Corsi, construction of the Trans-Texas Corridor, the first leg of the NAFTA Super Highway, is to begin next year.

 

The beneficiaries of this NAFTA Super Highway project would be the contractors who build it and the importers and outlet stores for the Chinese-manufactured goods that would come flooding in. The losers would be U.S. longshoremen, truckers, manufacturers and taxpayers.

 

The latter would pay the cost of building the highway in Mexico and the United States, both in dollars and in the lost sovereignty of our once-independent American republic.

 

Sanctuary Cities

Posted in Immigration with tags on September 14, 2008 by zion2day

That so called sanctuary cities could be set up and maintained in defiance of federal immigration laws, and yet still expect – and receive – federal money to finance their social programs flies in the face of all reason. If a citizen of that municipality should harbor a fugitive from federal justice and expect the federal government to continue giving him aid to maintain not only his family but the fugitive also, he’d all too soon wake up to find the municipality’s police officers breaking down his door to apprehend the fugitive – and himself – for aiding and abetting or harboring a fugitive. Is a municipal government above the law it applies to its own citizens or do municipal governments and federal government alike derive their just power from the citizenry?

 

Power derived unjustly is tyranny. Therefore, logic dictates that if the citizen be tried and held accountable for like crime, those officials who set aside the law to do that which is contrary to the law should be required to be tried and held accountable.

 

The question must then be asked, are the protections of the law that is violated strengthened or weakened for the citizens for whom the law was designed to protect?

 

Giving safe harbor to illegal aliens has the following effects: It provides cover for illegal activities such as smuggling, counterfeiting, identity theft, and fraud against governmental and commercial entities as well as private citizens. The criminal element fostered by this system promotes gang violence, drug trafficking, prostitution as well as other crimes. It burdens schools, hospitals, clinics and other social services with a cliental that requires additional expenditures in money, manpower and time to provide bi-lingual and taxpayer subsidized services; which, if taxes are not increased will lead increased service fees for citizens, or a decline in quality of the services offered to all along with an increased wait for services rendered.

 

None of these things strengthen the protections offered by the law; mainly of safety, the quality of governmental services, or not having to increase the tax burden upon the citizens. Such actions benefit only the illegal aliens who – by law – should not be here to enjoy said benefits and politicians/political parties who by circumventing the law seek to expand their voter base to further advance programs at the expense of the citizens they were elected to serve.

 

If none of the benefits which the law provides to the citizen are improved by its violation, and the benefit to the political party is an illegal expansion of the voter base for future actions, one has to ask, following subsequent elections what those future actions would be. If protection of the rights and privileges of its current citizens isn’t its primary concern,  that party certainly won’t place a paternal arm around its illegitimate citizens for long. The goal therefore, must be narrow in who it serves, illegal and detrimental to our constitutional Republic for all others, and finally, unable to be achieved by constitutional means. In short, the overthrow of the constitutional republican government of our nation.

 

These political leaders are in effect to be held in to a higher standard before the law than the citizen as their actions impact the many rather than the few. And having passed from contempt for the law find themselves embarked upon the low road of sedition

 

Seeing the confusion which varying state laws had upon the process of naturalizing aliens prior to the adoption of the U.S. Constitution, Alexander Hamilton wrote the following in The Federalist No. 32:

The third will be found in that clause which declares that Congress shall have power “to establish an UNIFORM RULE of naturalization throughout the United States.” This must necessarily be exclusive; because if each State had power to prescribe a DISTINCT RULE, there could not be a UNIFORM RULE.”

Cities [and their ranking in 100 largest U.S. cities] and counties with sanctuary policies:

Anchorage [70th], Alaska

Fairbanks, Alaska

Chandler [81st], Arizona

Fresno [37], California

Los Angeles [2nd], California

San Diego [8th], California

San Francisco [15th], California

Sonoma County, California

Cicero, Illinios

Evanston, Illinois

Portland, Maine

Baltimore [19th], Maryland

Takoma Park, Maryland

Cambridge, Massachusetts

Orleans, Massachusetts

Ann Arbor, Michigan

Detroit [11th], Michigan

Minneapolis [49th], Minnisota

Albuquerque [33rd], New Mexico

Aztec, New Mexico

Rio Arriba County, New Mexico

Sante Fe, New Mexico (state capital)

New York [1st], New York

Durham [100th], North Carolina

Ashland, Oregon

Gaston, Oregon

Marion County, Oregon

Austin [17th], Texas (state capital)

Houston [4th], Texas

Katy, Texas

Seattle [26th], Washington

Madison 86th], Wisconsin (state capital)

(Source: ‘Enforcing Immigration Law: The Role of State and Local Law Enforcement,’ Congressional Research Service, last updated Aug. 14, 2006 – note: Alaska, Maine and Oregon are now sanctuary states)

To preserve the Union the Federal Government must act to stop the rebellion now!

See also: http://www.thesocialcontract.com/pdf/fifteen-three/xv-3-192.pdf

Proclamation 4865–High seas interdiction of illegal aliens

Posted in Immigration with tags on September 8, 2008 by zion2day

Proclamation 4865–High seas interdiction of illegal aliens

Source: The provisions of Proclamation 4865 of Sept. 29, 1981, appear at 46 FR 48107, 3 CFR, 1981 Comp., p. 50, unless otherwise noted.

The ongoing migration of persons to the United States in violation of our laws is a serious national problem detrimental to the interests of the United States. A particularly difficult aspect of the problem is the continuing illegal migration by sea of large numbers of undocumented aliens into the southeastern United States. These arrivals have severely strained the law enforcement resources of the Immigration and Naturalization Service and have threatened the welfare and safety of communities in that region.

As a result of our discussions with the Governments of affected foreign countries and with agencies of the Executive Branch of our Government, I have determined that new and effective measures to curtail these unlawful arrivals are necessary. In this regard, I have determined that international cooperation to intercept vessels trafficking in illegal migrants is a necessary and proper means of insuring the effective enforcement of our laws.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, RONALD REAGAN, President of the United States of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the statutes of the United States, including Sections 212(f) and 215(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a)(1)), in order to protect the sovereignty of the United States, and in accordance with cooperative arrangements with certain foreign governments, and having found that the entry of undocumented aliens, arriving at the borders of the United States from the high seas, is detrimental to the interests of the United States, do proclaim that:

The entry of undocumented aliens from the high seas is hereby suspended and shall be prevented by the interdiction of certain vessels carrying such aliens.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth day of September, in the year of our Lord nineteen hundred and eighty-one, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and sixth.